+- UO Lost Lands Forum (https://uolostlands.com/forum)
+-- Forum: General (https://uolostlands.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Suggestions (https://uolostlands.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Thread: Anatomy need to be fixed! (/showthread.php?tid=708)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Anatomy need to be fixed! - Jack - 01-12-2016
Couple of PvP changes on test now:
- Evaluating intelligence is more of a factor in spell damage. Spell damages for GM eval have not changed.
- You can now cycle a weapon while tabbed out. I thought I already made this change before but it must have never been committed to the shard's repository.
RE: Anatomy need to be fixed! - Abyz - 01-12-2016
Make sure you hop on TC and tell us what you think!
RE: Anatomy need to be fixed! - farnk - 01-12-2016
I shall be checking it out.
RE: Anatomy need to be fixed! - Skynyrd - 01-20-2016
Thanks for the changes.
If you still believe anatomy is an issue without boggling up anatomy/Eval effecting dexxer templates and other things. Why couldn't we just make the harm disrupt not 100% without 100 Eval thus nerfing it a bit.
I don't personally see it as an issue as there are advantages to both. However if I am reading correctly the changes were made to spell damage at 0 Eval. While yes 0 Eval spell damage was a bit high , I do not believe that will fix the issue many are upset about. Due to the fact if you cycle well enough you do not need higher level damage spells.
RE: Anatomy need to be fixed! - Abyz - 01-20-2016
Spell damage with 0 eval is still higher than we are used to... On the old t2a shard. However, even with the lower numbers, an anatomy/no eval tank was a beast in the ring there. More spell damage and 100% disrupts on that template here steps up that power even more. On the flip side, a no eval tank is far less dangerous in a group battle. I personally have settled on keeping eval on my tournament guy since I use him for events and field fighting. In the arena, a good cycle with anatomy def has the edge on a traditional swords mage.